|
"Unreliable" paternity tests - how can you be sure? |
|
In recent articles in the Daily Mail, the Mail on Sunday and the Times Online Judge Hayden highlighted 'deficiencies' in the work of one DNA firm hired by lawyers in a Family Court case – however unlike the accompanying headline his comments were focussed on a single company – not the entire industry.
If customers choose their testing company carefully they can have complete confidence in the reliability of the DNA testing undertaken. There are a number of factors which solicitors, social workers and the general public should consider when making their choice their choice of testing laboratory. |
|
Read more...
|
|
|
Beware of DNA misrepresentation |
|
It maybe the peak time of the year for DNA paternity testing registrations but it also appears to be high-noon for some companies passing themselves off a something they aren't! If you're a solicitor registering a DNA paternity testing case it's recommended that you check the accreditation of potential suppliers who may have contacted you recently - very carefully. |
|
Read more...
|
|
|
Imitation is the most sincere form of flattery? |
|
Cellmark, the world's first private DNA fingerprinting laboratory is the UK's most recommended DNA Paternity testing company - and now, it appears, possibly the most copied! The company has recently identified yet another supplier of DNA testing that has copied the way in which Cellmark targets its information to its customers. |
|
Read more...
|
|
|
|
<< Start < Prev 1 2 3 Next > End >>
|
| Results 1 - 4 of 11 |
